Shoulder Dystocia
|
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002
Sep;78(3):253-6.
Erb's palsy without shoulder dystocia.
Sandmire HF, DeMott RK.
Ob-gyn Associates, Green Bay, LTD., Green Bay, WI, USA.
cryslcond@aol.com
Objectives:
The purpose of this commentary is to review
certain articles which have provided evidence that Erb's
palsy can occur without associated shoulder dystocia.
The mechanism of the specific cause of the injury will
be described.
Methods:
Prior to the last 10-12 years it
was assumed that Erb's palsy occurred exclusively with
and was the result of shoulder dystocia. Gonik et al.
[Am J Perinat 1991;8:31-34], reported on a research
study based on the premise that when Erb's palsies
occurred there must have been shoulder dystocia present
but it went undetected by the delivering physician.
Subsequently Gherman [Am J Obstet Gynecol
1998;178:423-427], published a detailed study which
carefully looked at multiple aspects of shoulder
dystocia including those similar injuries occurring with
and without associated shoulder dystocia.
Results:
Both
Gonik's and Gherman's research revealed distinct
maternal and newborn differences when comparing Erb's
palsy occurring with and without associated shoulder
dystocia. These differences, which have nothing to do
with the ability to recognize shoulder dystocia, provide
conclusive evidence that Erb's palsy does occur without
associated shoulder dystocia.
Conclusions:
Therefore,
Gonik's original premise, that shoulder dystocia must
have been present if Erb's palsy occurred, is not
supported. This brings into question the cause of Erb's
palsy in those cases without shoulder dystocia. The
maternal forces are the most likely cause both with and
without shoulder dystocia.