Tumour Markers

Tumour Markers

 

What are tumour markers?

Home
Blog - What's New?
Abortion
Acne
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Anatomy Female
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Breast Feeding
Cancer in Women
Childbirth
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometrial Ablation
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Female Sterilization
Fibroids
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
HRT/HormoneReplacementTherapy
Hysterectomy
Infection
Infertility
Irritable Bowel Syndrome IBS
Libido - Sex Drive
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Menstruation Menstrual Cycle
Miscarriage
Obesity
Ovarian Cysts
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Prolapse
SHOP / SHOPPING MALL UK
SHOP / Shopping Mall - USA
Ultrasound
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
Urinary Incontinence
Vaginal Discharge
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
Weight Loss-Dieting
Illustrations
The Author
Contact Us



Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Feb 15;14(4):1065-72.


Diagnostic markers for early detection of ovarian cancer.
Visintin I, Feng Z, Longton G, Ward DC, Alvero AB, Lai Y, Tenthorey J, Leiser A, Flores-Saaib R, Yu H, Azori M, Rutherford T, Schwartz PE, Mor G.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA.

Purpose:

Early detection would significantly decrease the mortality rate of ovarian cancer. In this study, we characterize and validate the combination of six serum biomarkers that discriminate between disease-free and ovarian cancer patients with high efficiency. EXPERIMENTAL

Design:

We analyzed 362 healthy controls and 156 newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients. Concentrations of leptin, prolactin, osteopontin, insulin-like growth factor II, macrophage inhibitory factor, and CA-125 were determined using a multiplex, bead-based, immunoassay system. All six markers were evaluated in a training set (181 samples from the control group and 113 samples from OC patients) and a test set (181 sample control group and 43 ovarian cancer).

Results:

Multiplex and ELISA exhibited the same pattern of expression for all the biomarkers. None of the biomarkers by themselves were good enough to differentiate healthy versus cancer cells. However, the combination of the six markers provided a better differentiation than CA-125. Four models with <2% classification error in training sets all had significant improvement (sensitivity 84%-98% at specificity 95%) over CA-125 (sensitivity 72% at specificity 95%) in the test set. The chosen model correctly classified 221 out of 224 specimens in the test set, with a classification accuracy of 98.7%.

Conclusions:

We describe the first blood biomarker test with a sensitivity of 95.3% and a specificity of 99.4% for the detection of ovarian cancer. Six markers provided a significant improvement over CA-125 alone for ovarian cancer detection. Validation was performed with a blinded cohort. This novel multiplex platform has the potential for efficient screening in patients who are at high risk for ovarian cancer.



Back Home Up Next

Please click on the required question.