|
|
Authors:
Slayden SM.
Institution:
Dr. S. M. Slayden, Repro. Endocrinol./Infertility Sec., Dept. of Obstetrics
And Gynecology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912; United States.
Title:
Risks of menopausal androgen supplementation. (1998 2691)
Source:
Seminars in Reproductive Endocrinology. Vol 16(2) (pp45-152), 1998.
Abstract:
There is increasing interest in the use of menopausal androgen replacement
therapy (MART) in symptomatic women undergoing natural or surgical menopause.
However, the efficacy of MART in alleviating these symptoms compared to
traditional estrogen/progestin hormone replacement therapy remains a subject of
debate. Accordingly, attention must be focused on the side effects of the
various MART preparations. The dose, alkylation, and route of administration of
these compounds influences the development of side effects. While all androgens
are potential virilizing agents, alkylated compounds have an additional risk of
inducing severe hepatic consequences, regardless of their route of
administration. Fortunately, the lower doses administered to women compared to
men has not resulted in significant hepatic events. Generation of an adverse
lipoprotein profile is possible but is not addressed in this article. Thus,
virilizing and cutaneous side effects remain the primary concern. While some
observational studies indicate acne and/or hirsutism are evident in up to 38%
and 36% of oral methyltestosterone- treated patients, respectively, other
studies performed in a prospective fashion suggest a much lower incidence of
approximately 5%. Other reported virilizing effects include deepening of the
voice and clitoromegaly. Additional concerns are related to risks of developing
endometrial hyperplasia when MART is used in conjunction with estrogens.
Fortunately, concomitant progestin administration is protective. Finally, there
is a theoretical concern that MART may increase the risk of developing
breast cancer but this has not been demonstrated in clinical practice.
Overall, the safety profile of MART appears to be acceptable when dosing avoids
supraphysiologic testosterone levels.

|
|