PMS Premenstrual Syndrome
PMS Premenstrual Syndrome


PMS: Could suppressing my cycle improve my PMS?

Home
What's New - Blog
Abortion
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Cancer in Women
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Fibroids
HRT Risks & Benefits
Hysterectomy
Infections
Infertility
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Miscarriage
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Vaginal Discharge
Vaginal Prolapse
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
The Author
Consultations
Contact Us

Q 25. 8 Could suppressing my menstrual cycle reduce my PMS problems?

BJOG. 2004 Jun;111(6):585-93.

 

The effectiveness of GnRHa with and without 'add-back' therapy in treating premenstrual syndrome: a meta analysis.

Authors:

Wyatt KM,Dimmock PW,Ismail KM,Jones PW,O'Brien PM.

Exeter and North Devon RDSU, Exeter, UK.

Objectives:

To determine the effectiveness of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) with and without hormonal add-back therapy in the management of premenstrual syndrome.

Design:

Randomised controlled trials were identified by searching multiple databases.

Setting:

Exeter and North Devon Research and Development Support Unit and Keele University Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

Population:

Women with pre-diagnosed premenstrual syndrome and/or premenstrual dysphoric disorder.

Methods:

A meta-analysis of published randomised placebo-controlled trials assessing the use of GnRHa in the management of premenstrual syndrome. The standardised mean difference for each individual study and subsequently an overall standardised mean difference were calculated after demonstrating the consistency or homogeneity of the study results.

Settings, Design and Main Outcome Measures:

Overall improvement in premenstrual symptomatology and effectiveness of GnRHa with additional hormonal add-back therapy were the main outcome measures assessed in this analysis. A secondary analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of GnRHa in treating physical and emotional symptoms.

Results:

Overall standardised mean difference for all trials that assessed the efficacy of GnRHa was -1.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.88 to -0.51). The e quivalent odds ratio was 8.66 (95% CI 2.52 to 30.26) in favour of GnRHa. GnRHa were more efficacious for physical than behavioural symptoms, although the difference was not statistically significant. The addition of hormonal add-back therapy to GnRHa did not appear to reduce the efficacy of GnRHa alone; standardised mean difference 0.12 (95% CI -0.35 to 0.58).

Conclusions:

GnRHa appear to be an effective treatment in the management of premenstrual syndrome. The addition of hormonal add-back therapy to reduce side effects does not reduce efficacy.

Back Home Up Next

Please click on the required question.

Do you have an unanswered women's health question?

Please let us have your general question on our NEW FORUM / MESSAGE BOARDS facility and we will try to answer it for you. I am sure that you will appreciate that we cannot offer advice on the management of an individual's specific problem.


Thank you for your visiting us at 2WomensHealth.com.

This is the personal website of David A Viniker MD FRCOG, Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist at Whipps Cross University Hospital, London.

I do hope that you find the answers to your questions in the patient information and medical advice provided. If you still have unanswered questions, please consider entering them into one of our forums and I will try to assist you.

DISCLAIMER

The aim of this web site is to provide a general guide and it is not intended as a substitute for a consultation with an appropriate specialist in respect of individual care and treatment.

PMS Premenstrual Syndrome