PMS Premenstrual Syndrome

PMS Premenstrual Syndrome

 

PMS: What is premenstrual syndrome (PMS; premenstrual tension; PMT)?

Home
Blog - What's New?
Abortion
Acne
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Anatomy Female
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Breast Feeding
Cancer in Women
Childbirth
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometrial Ablation
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Female Sterilization
Fibroids
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
HRT/HormoneReplacementTherapy
Hysterectomy
Infection
Infertility
Irritable Bowel Syndrome IBS
Libido - Sex Drive
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Menstruation Menstrual Cycle
Miscarriage
Obesity
Ovarian Cysts
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Prolapse
SHOP / SHOPPING MALL UK
SHOP / Shopping Mall - USA
Ultrasound
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
Urinary Incontinence
Vaginal Discharge
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
Weight Loss-Dieting
Illustrations
The Author
Contact Us

Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Feb;40(1):47-56.

Population study of premenstrual syndrome

Silva CM,Gigante DP,Carret ML,Fassa AG.

Programa de Pos-graduacao em Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RS, Brazil. celene.longo@terra.com.br

Objectives:

To study the prevalence of premenstrual syndrome and the factors associated with this, by comparing the obtained frequency with the self-reported frequency.

Methods:

This was a cross-sectional population-based study, involving 1,395 women aged 15 to 49 years old in a medium-sized municipality in Southern Brazil, carried out in 2003. Questionnaires were applied to measure the prevalence of premenstrual syndrome by means of a score based on five premenstrual symptoms that interfered with family life or led to absence from work or school. Associations with socioeconomic, demographic and behavioral variables were investigated. Self-reported syndrome was investigated with regard to its sensitivity and specificity, taking the score as the gold standard. The statistical analyses performed were Pearson chi2, Mantel-Haenszel and Poisson regression, with Kappa coefficients to verify the concordance of the responses.

Results:

The obtained prevalence was 25.2% (95% CI: 22.5-27.9) and the self-reported prevalence was 60.3% (95% CI: 57.4-63.3). The principal premenstrual symptoms found were: irritability, abdominal discomfort, nervousness, headache, fatigue and breast pain; all of these showed prevalence of over 50%. Higher risk was presented by women of higher socioeconomic level, better schooling level, aged under 30 years and with white skin color. Psychotropic drug users and women who were not using any hormonal contraceptive presented higher prevalence of the syndrome. The sensitivity of the test was 94%, specificity 51% and accuracy 62%.

Conclusions:

A high prevalence of premenstrual syndrome was found. Even though the women's perception of the syndrome was higher than the result measured by the symptom score, one quarter of the women presented this health problem.




Back Home Up Next

Please click on the required question.