endometrial ablation

endometrial ablation

 

What is endometrial ablation?

Home Women's Health
What's New
Absent Periods
Acne
AIDS
Alternative Medicine
Anatomy Female
Anorexia Nervosa
Bladder Symptoms
Breast Cancer
Cancer In Women
Candida
Cervical Cancer
Cervical Erosion
Cervix
Children and Adolescents
Chlamydia
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Constipation
Contraception
Coronary Heart Disease
Diagnosis and Treatment
Diet
Disease Processes
Down Syndrome
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometrial Ablation
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Fibroids
Genital Warts
Heavy Periods
Herpes
Hirsutism
HIV
HPV
HRT - Risks and Benefits
HRT Preparations
Hysterectomy
IBS



Authors:

Donnez J. Vilos G. Gannon MJ. Maheux R. Emanuel MH. Istre O.

Institution:

Prof. J. Donnez, Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital Saint-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200 Brussels; Belgium.

Title:

Goserelin acetate (Zoladex) plus endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: A 3-year follow-up evaluation (2001-3255).

Source:

Fertility and Sterility. Vol 75(3) (pp20-622), 2001.

Abstract:

Objectives:

To report the results of a 3-year follow-up evaluation of a trial comparing goserelin acetate depot injections with sham injections before endometrial ablation for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB).

Design:

Prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study.

Setting:

Thirty-seven centers in 12 countries.

Patients:

Three-hundred and fifty-eight premenopausal women aged over 30 years with DUB. Intervention(s): Goserelin acetate (3.6 mg depot) every 28 days for 8 weeks, or sham depot every 28 days for 8 weeks, with endometrial ablation 6 weeks +/- 3 days after the first depot injection (i.e., when the endometrium is at its thinnest). The follow-up continued for 3 years.

Main Outcome Measure(s):

At the 3-year follow-up, bleeding in the previous 3 months and need for surgical intervention were recorded.

Results:

At 3 years, amenorrhea rates were 21% in the goserelin acetate group and 14% in the control group (estimated odds ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 0.98-3.25; P=.0571). The surgical intervention rate (since the original procedure) was low and did not differ significantly between groups. For hysterectomy, it was 21% for the goserelin acetate group and 15% for the control group. For repeat ablations, it was 5.6% for the goserelin acetate group and 2.1% for the control group.

Conclusion(s):

Prethinning with goserelin acetate before endometrial ablation resulted in higher long-term amenorrhea rates than ablation without prethinning. Copyright (copyright) 2001 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.




Back Home Up Next

Please click on the required question.