Female Infertility Treatments

Female Infertility Treatments



What are in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and embryo transfer?

Please subscribe to receive our FREE women's health newsletter.
STAY UP TO DATE on the important issues affecting YOUR HEALTH.
First Name:
Family Name:
Email:
Profession:
Country:
Age:
Home
What's New - Blog
Abortion
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Cancer in Women
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Female Sexual Problems
GUESTBOOK
HRT Risks & Benefits
Hysterectomy
Infections
Infertility
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Miscarriage
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Vaginal Discharge
Vaginal Prolapse
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
The Author
Consultations
Contact Us


Hum Reprod. 1999 Sep;14(9):2411-5.

The influence of bacterial vaginosis on in-vitro fertilization and embryo implantation during assisted reproduction treatment.Liversedge NH,Turner A,Horner PJ,Keay SD,Jenkins JM,Hull MG.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Michael's Hospital, Southwell Street, Bristol BS2 8EG, Public Health Laboratory, Bristol , UK.

There is growing evidence that the pathogenic effects of bacterial vaginosis may not be confined to the lower genital tract. Possible associations with infertility and effects on fertilization and implantation were studied in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. High vaginal swabs taken at the time of oocyte collection were assessed by Gram staining. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and of intermediate and normal flora in 301 patients was 25.6, 14.0 and 60.4% respectively. Bacterial vaginosis was more prevalent in patients with tubal (31.5%, n = 149) compared with non-tubal (19.7%, n = 152) infertility (odds ratio (OR) 1.87, CI 1.11-3.18, P = 0.02). Bacterial vaginosis did not have an adverse effect on fertilization rate. Further, no significant difference in implantation rates was seen when comparing bacterial vaginosis (15. 8%, OR 1.03, CI 0.66-1.61) and intermediate flora (13.1%, OR 0.82, CI 0.45-1.52) with normal flora (15.5%). Though confidence intervals around the observations were relatively wide, the findings suggest that routine screening for bacterial vaginosis in the hope of improving the success of IVF treatment is not justified. The prevention of complications in pregnancy associated with bacterial vaginosis might be a more relevant indication for screening at the time of IVF treatment, in particular patients with tubal disease, if treatment were shown to be effective for that particular purpose. However, antibiotic treatment before IVF has been shown to be positively disadvantageous for IVF by encouraging other organisms.

Back Home Up Next


See Also:

Do you have an unanswered women's health question?

Please let us have your general question on our NEW FORUM / MESSAGE BOARDS facility and we will try to answer it for you. I am sure that you will appreciate that we cannot offer advice on the management of an individual's specific problem.

 

 

Please subscribe to receive our FREE women's health newsletter.
STAY UP TO DATE on the important issues affecting YOUR HEALTH.
First Name:
Family Name:
Email:
Profession:
Country:
Age:
 

DISCLAIMER

The aim of this web site is to provide a general guide and it is not intended as a substitute for a consultation with an appropriate specialist in respect of individual care and treatment.

Thank you for your visiting us at 2womenshealth.com.

This is the personal website of David A Viniker MD FRCOG, Consultant Obstetrician and Gynaecologist at Whipps Cross University Hospital, London.

I do hope that you find the answers to your questions in the patient information and medical advice provided. If you still have unanswered questions, please consider entering them into one of our forums and I will try to assist you.

Female Infertility Treatments