Female Infertility Treatments

Female Infertility Treatments

 

What are in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer?

Home
Blog - What's New?
Abortion
Acne
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Anatomy Female
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Breast Feeding
Cancer in Women
Childbirth
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometrial Ablation
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Female Sterilization
Fibroids
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
HRT/HormoneReplacementTherapy
Hysterectomy
Infection
Infertility
Irritable Bowel Syndrome IBS
Libido - Sex Drive
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Menstruation Menstrual Cycle
Miscarriage
Obesity
Ovarian Cysts
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Prolapse
SHOP / SHOPPING MALL UK
SHOP / Shopping Mall - USA
Ultrasound
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
Urinary Incontinence
Vaginal Discharge
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
Weight Loss-Dieting
Illustrations
The Author
Contact Us

 

Hum Reprod. 2008 May;23(5):1101-6.
A randomized controlled clinical trial of 2295 ultrasound-guided embryo transfers.
Drakeley AJ, Jorgensen A, Sklavounos J, Aust T, Gazvani R, Williamson P, Kingsland CR.

Hewitt Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Crown Street, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK. adrakeley@yahoo.com

Background:

We wanted to test the hypothesis that using abdominal ultrasound at the time of embryo transfer to guide replacement, improved pregnancy rates by at least 5%.

Methods:

An RCT in a large assisted conception unit. A pilot study and power calculation suggested that at least 2000 embryo transfers were required to demonstrate a difference of 5%, for a test with 80% power and Type 1 error 0.05. Randomization, data entry and analysis were arranged independently. Randomization was stratified for age and fresh/frozen embryo transfer. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results:

There was no difference in clinical pregnancy or live birth rates between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate for ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was 22% and for non-ultrasound-guided embryo transfer was 23% (odds ratio: 0.96; 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.18).

Conclusions:

We set out to determine whether ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improved clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in assisted conception. We used an appropriately powered RCT design. We did not demonstrate a difference. This outcome is at odds with the UKs National Institute of Clinical Excellence recommendations for fertility treatment (Fertility Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. London, UK: RCOG Press, 2004, 112.) which used a meta-analysis of four smaller trials (range 362-800 patients, totalling 2051 embryo transfers) to conclude that ultrasound should be offered. We suggest that the current Cochrane review should be updated with data from our trial and recommend that consideration is given to accounting for heterogeneity between the included trials.



Back Home Up Next


Please click on the required question..