Female Infertility Tests

Female Infertility Tests



What is the effect smoking on our fertility?

Please subscribe to receive our FREE women's health newsletter.
STAY UP TO DATE on the important issues affecting YOUR HEALTH.
First Name:
Family Name:
Email:
Profession:
Country:
Age:
Home
Women's Health Update Blog
Abortion
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Cancer in Women
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Female Sexual Problems
GUESTBOOK
HRT Risks & Benefits
Hysterectomy
Infections
Infertility
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Miscarriage
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Vaginal Discharge
Vaginal Prolapse
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
The Author
Consultations
Contact Us


Authors:

Augood C. Duckitt K. Templeton AA.

Institution:

C. Augood, Clinical Guidelines, Royal Coll. Obstetricians Gynaecol., 27

Sussex Place, London NW1 4RG; United Kingdom. Title

Smoking and female infertility: A systematic review and meta-analysis (1998-2163). Source

Human Reproduction. Vol 13(6) (pp532-1539), 1998. Abstract

The high prevalence ofsmoking among women in their reproductive years continues to be a matter of concern. The negative effects ofsmoking on general health are well known, butsmoking may also affect fertility. The objective of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine whether there is an association betweensmoking and risk ofinfertility in women of reproductive age, and to assess the size of this effect. In the 12 studies used for this meta-analysis, the overall value of the odds ratio (OR) for risk ofinfertility in women smokers versus non-smokers was 1.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.34-1.91]. Studies of subfertile women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment also show a reduction in fecundity among women smokers. A meta-analysis of nine studies found an OR of 0.66 (95% CI 0.49-0.88) for pregnancies per number of IVF-treated cycles in smokers versus non-smokers. Despite the potential limitations of meta-analyses of observational studies, the evidence presented in this review is compelling because of the consistency of effect across different study designs, sample size and types of outcome. However, continued reassurance is needed that the calculated overall effect is not in fact due to confounding variables.


Back Home Up Next

 

Please click on the required question.