Women's Diseases - Diagnosis and Treatment

Women's Diseases - Diagnosis and Treatment



What is pelvic ultrasound?

Home
Blog - What's New?
Abortion
Acne
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Anatomy Female
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Breast Feeding
Cancer in Women
Childbirth
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometrial Ablation
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Female Sterilization
Fibroids
HRT/HormoneReplacementTherapy
Hysterectomy
Infection
Infertility
Irritable Bowel Syndrome IBS
Libido - Sex Drive
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Menstruation Menstrual Cycle
Miscarriage
Obesity
Ovarian Cysts
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Prolapse
SHOP / SHOPPING MALL UK
SHOP / Shopping Mall - USA
Ultrasound
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
Urinary Incontinence
Vaginal Discharge
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
Weight Loss-Dieting
Illustrations
The Author
Contact Us


Obstet Gynecol. 1998 May;91(5 Pt 1):750-6.

Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent neurologic development.Kieler H,Ahlsten G,Haglund B,Salvesen K,Axelsson O.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Objectives:

To test the null hypothesis of no association between ultrasound exposure in early fetal life and impaired neurologic development in childhood.

Methods:

Study of children age 8-9 years whose mothers participated in a randomized controlled trial of ultrasound screening during pregnancy in Sweden during 1985-1987. Of 4637 eligible singletons, 3265 (70%) were studied through a questionnaire to their mothers. Assessment of neurologic development was based on parents' report of their child's speech and motor development. Behavioral disorders were assessed by a ten-item parent scale. Analyses were performed according to both assignment and ultrasound exposure. With a sample size of 1600 children in each group, a two-sided alpha of .05 and beta of .10, a risk ratio of less than 1.4 for the studied variables could not be detected.

Results:

Delayed speech development was reported by 2.9% in the screening group compared with 2.4% in the nonscreening group (odds ratio [OR] 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79, 1.88). Similar prevalences were found when analysis was according to ultrasound exposure (OR 1.19, 95% CI 0.78, 1.83). Delayed motor development was reported by 7.6% in the screening group compared with 7.2% in the nonscreening group (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.81, 1.37). Corresponding figures for ultrasound-exposed and -unexposed were 7.7% and 7.2%, respectively (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.83, 1.40). There also were no significant differences in behavioral disorders between screened and unscreened children or between exposed and unexposed children, respectively, according to parents' ratings.

Conclusion:

No significant difference in impaired neurologic development between ultrasound-exposed and -unexposed children was found in this study.


Back Home Up Next


Please click on the required question.