Women's Diseases - Diagnosis and Treatment

Women's Diseases - Diagnosis and Treatment



What is pelvic ultrasound?

Home
Blog - What's New?
Abortion
Acne
Amenorrhoea - Absent Periods
Anatomy Female
Birth Control
Bladder Symptoms
Breast Feeding
Cancer in Women
Childbirth
Diet / Weight Loss
Dysmenorrhoea
Ectopic Pregnancy
Endometrial Ablation
Endometriosis
Female Sexual Problems
Female Sterilization
Fibroids
HRT/HormoneReplacementTherapy
Hysterectomy
Infection
Infertility
Irritable Bowel Syndrome IBS
Libido - Sex Drive
Medication - Drugs
Menopause
Menorrhagia Heavy Periods
Menstruation Menstrual Cycle
Miscarriage
Obesity
Ovarian Cysts
Painful Sex - Dyspareunia
Pap Smear Test
PCOS
Pelvic Inflammatory Disease
Pelvic Pain
PMS- Premenstrual Syndrome
Pregnancy & Childbirth
Prolapse
SHOP / SHOPPING MALL UK
SHOP / Shopping Mall - USA
Ultrasound
Urinary Tract Infection - UTI
Urinary Incontinence
Vaginal Discharge
Viagra, Libido and Sex Drive.
Weight Loss-Dieting
Illustrations
The Author
Contact Us


Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Nov;104(11):1267-72.  

Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent growth, vision and hearing. Kieler H ,Haglund B,Waldenstrom U,Axelsson O .

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Uppsala University, Sweden.

Objectives:

To test a hypothesis of no association between ultrasound exposure in early fetal life and growth or impaired vision or hearing during childhood.

Design:

Follow up of eight to nine year old children born to women who participated in a randomised controlled trial on ultrasound screening during pregnancy.

Setting:

Nineteen antenatal care clinics run by three central hospitals in Sweden from 1985 to 1987.

Population and Methods:

Of 4637 eligible singleton pregnancies, 3265 (71%) were followed up through a questionnaire sent to their mothers. Analyses were performed both according to randomised groups and to ultrasound exposure.

Settings, Design and Main Outcome Measures:

Parents' report of vision and hearing tests as recorded on child's record card. Parents' report of their child's weight and height at 1, 4 and 7 years of age.

Results:

Reduced hearing was reported by 3.4% in the screening group compared with 3.5% in the nonscreening group (odds ratio [OR] 1.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.41). The same prevalences were found when analysed according to ultrasound exposure (OR 1.0; 95% CI 0.67-1.42). Reduced vision was reported by 6.3% in the screening group compared with 7.8% in the nonscreening group (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.60-1.03). Corresponding figures for ultrasound exposed and unexposed were 6.2% and 8.0%, respectively (OR 0.8; 95% CI 0.58-1.00). No statistically significant differences in body weight or height at 1, 4 or 7 years of age between screened and not screened children or between exposed and unexposed were found.

Conclusion:

This study found no association between ultrasound exposure in early fetal life and growth or impaired vision or hearing during childhood.


Back Home Up Next


Please click on the required question.